Covid-19 Et Vaccins À Adénovirus: Expérience Française De Suivi Renforcé De Pharmacovigilance COVID-19 and adenovirus vaccines: French experience of enhanced pharmacovigilance

Résumé Dans le cadre de la campagne de vaccination contre la COVID-19, l'Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et l'ensemble des 31 centres régionaux de pharmacovigilance ont été mobilisés dans un dispositif exceptionnel de surveillance renforcée de pharmacovigilance des vaccins. Concernant les vaccins à adénovirus, Vaxzévria® et Jcovden®, ce dispositif national basé sur l'analyse quotidienne des cas notifiés d'effets indésirables, a permis d'identifier précocement des signaux de sécurité, certains validés depuis, d'autres encore en cours d'analyse, communs avec les vaccins à ARNm ou plus spécifiques tels que les thrombopénies thrombosantes immunitaires induites par le vaccin. Venu en complément des actions européennes et internationales, ce suivi a contribué à mieux définir le profil de sécurité de ces vaccins et conduit à redéfinir la stratégie vaccinale dans notre pays. Même si aujourd'hui ces vaccins n'ont plus de place dans la stratégie vaccinale nationale, ils restent utilisés dans d'autres pays à qui l'expérience acquise pourra être utile de même qu'elle permettra d'alimenter la réflexion sur de futures thérapeutiques faisant intervenir des vecteurs viraux.

[COVID-19 and adenovirus vaccines: French experience of enhanced pharmacovigilance]. / COVID-19 et vaccins à adénovirus : expérience française de suivi renforcé de pharmacovigilance: Pharmacovigilance française des vaccins à adénovirus.

As part of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, the National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products and all 31 regional pharmacovigilance centers were mobilized in an exceptional reinforced vaccine pharmacovigilance surveillance system. Concerning adenovirus vaccines, Vaxzévria® and Jcovden®, this national system, based on the daily analysis of notified cases of adverse events, has allowed the early identification of safety signals, some of which have been validated, others still under analysis, common to mRNA vaccines or more specific of adenovirus vaccines such as Vaccine Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia. Complementing european and international actions, this follow-up has contributed to a better definition of the safety profile of these vaccines and has led to redefine the vaccine strategy in our country. Although today these two vaccines have no longer place in the national vaccine strategy, they are still used in other countries, where the experience acquired could be useful and will contribute to fuel the reflection on future therapies involving viral vectors.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome Associated with COVID-19 Vaccines: A Perspective From Spontaneous Report Data.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The concern surrounding the association between Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and vaccination has increased with the widespread use of COVID-19 vaccines. The aim of this study was to assess the potential association of GBS with mRNA-based or adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS: Reports of GBS associated with mRNA-based or adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines were extracted from the WHO pharmacovigilance database, exposure data from the Our World in Data website, and the background rates of GBS from published data. For countries contributing to VigiBase and with available data on COVID-19 vaccine exposure, reporting rates were estimated and observed-to-expected (OE) analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 2499 cases were included: 1157 (46.3%) cases with adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines and 1342 (53.7%) with mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines. The male-to-female sex ratio was 1.09 and the median (IQR) age was 57 (45-66) years. The reporting rates (95% CI) per 100,000 person-years within the 42-day window were 5.57 (5.13-6.03) for adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines and 1.39 (1.31-1.47) for mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, while the background incidence was 1.2-3.1 per 100,000 person-years. For mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, the OE ratio was <1 for both time windows in all European countries and slightly elevated for the 21-day window in the USA. For adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines, the OE ratio was consistently > 2.0 for all countries. Sensitivity analyses minimally altered these results. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest both the absence of safety concern for GBS with mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines and an increased risk with adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines. Back to top.

COVID-19 in DMARD-treated patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases: Insights from an analysis of the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is linked to the risk of COVID-19 among patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). METHODS: We performed a disproportionality analysis of the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database between January 1, 2020, and June 10, 2020. The frequency of COVID-19 reports for all DMARD classes identified was compared with that for all other reports for all other drugs and quoted as the reporting odds ratio (ROR) (95% confidence interval [CI]). RESULTS: Among 980,446 individual case-safety reports voluntarily recorded in the database, 398 identified COVID-19 in DMARD-treated patients with IRDs. There were 177 (44.5%) patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 120 (30.1%) with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), 93 (23.4%) with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and 8 (2.0%) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Most of the cases of COVID-19 occurred in patients taking anti-TNF agents (84.2%), resulting in a significant disproportionality signal (ROR [95% CI]: 8.31 [7.48-9.23]) - particularly in patients with RA, AS or PsA. A significant inverse disproportionality was found for the anti-IL-6 agent tocilizumab (ROR [95% CI]: 0.12 [0.02-0.88]) and JAK inhibitors (ROR [95% CI]: 0.33 [0.19-0.58]) in patients with RA - suggesting that these two drug classes are safer in the context of RA. CONCLUSION: Our results are in line with the literature on a potentially better safety profile for anti-IL-6 agents and JAK inhibitors. The WHO pharmacovigilance data suggest that COVID-19 is significantly more frequent in patients with IRDs treated with TNF inhibitors.

Abnormal laboratory findings and plasma concentration monitoring of lopinavir and ritonavir in COVID-19.

It is not known whether the adverse events (AEs) associated with the administration of lopinavir and ritonavir (LPV/r) in the treatment of COVID-19 are concentration-dependent. In a retrospective study of 65 patients treated with LPV/r and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for severe forms of COVID-19 (median age: 67; males: 41 [63.1%]), 33 (50.8%) displayed a grade ≥2 increase in plasma levels of hepatobiliary markers, lipase and/or triglycerides. A causal relationship between LPV/r and the AE was suspected in 9 of the 65 patients (13.8%). At 400 mg b.i.d., the plasma trough concentrations of LPV/r were high and showed marked interindividual variability (median [interquartile range]: 16,600 [11,430-20,842] ng/ml for lopinavir and 501 [247-891] ng/ml for ritonavir). The trough lopinavir concentration was negatively correlated with body mass index, while the trough ritonavir concentration was positively correlated with age and negatively correlated with prothrombin activity. However, the occurrence of abnormal laboratory values was not associated with higher trough plasma concentrations of LPV/r. Further studies will be needed to determine the value of TDM in LPV/r-treated patients with COVID-19.

Association between renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and COVID-19 complications.

AIMS: To describe the characteristics of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (including their long-term at-home medication use), and compare them with regard to the course of the disease. To assess the association between renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) and disease progression and critical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: All consecutive hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in a university hospital in Amiens (France) were included in this study. The primary composite endpoint was admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) or death before ICU admission. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with the composite endpoint. Between 28 February 2020 and 30 March 2020, a total of 499 local patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 231 were not hospitalized {males 33%; median [interquartile range (IQR)] age: 44 (32-54)}, and 268 were hospitalized [males 58%; median (IQR) age: 73 (61-84)]. A total of 116 patients met the primary endpoint: 47 died before ICU admission, and 69 were admitted to the ICU. Patients meeting the primary endpoint were more likely than patients not meeting the primary endpoint to have coronary heart disease and to have been taking RASIs; however, the two subsets of patients did not differ with regard to median age. After adjustment for other associated variables, the risk of meeting the composite endpoint was 1.73 times higher (odds ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.02-2.93) in patients treated at baseline with a RASI than in patients not treated with this drug class. This association was confirmed when the analysis was restricted to patients treated with antihypertensive agents. CONCLUSIONS: We highlighted a potential safety signal for RASIs, the long-term use of which was independently associated with a higher risk of severe COVID-19 and a poor outcome. Due to the widespread use of this important drug class, formal proof based on clinical trials is needed to better understand the association between RASIs and complications of COVID-19.